Salesforce · Integrations
Document intelligenceSalesforce · Integrations · Document intelligence
Synairo is two senior engineers in Warsaw. We design and build Salesforce architecture, enterprise integrations, and document intelligence for our clients - and we build and operate our own software with the same hands.
Michał Targiel and Marcin Jeziorek - the two engineers who do the work.
Most of our work sits where these overlap: a Salesforce org that has to stay in step with an ERP, or a document process that has to end in a record someone will be audited on. We take the whole seam rather than one side of it.
Data model, sharing model, and platform boundaries designed before the build - then built by the people who designed them.
Interfaces between Salesforce and the systems that own the data - designed for the day they fail, not just the day they ship.
Turning documents into structured records you can audit - extraction with confidence scores, source evidence, and a review path for anything uncertain.
Design, review, remediate, or build Salesforce-to-ERP interfaces with explicit ownership, failure handling, and production monitoring.
A structured review of an existing Salesforce org: findings, severity, evidence, and a prioritised remediation backlog.
Assessment of an integration estate: inventory, ownership, failure paths, observability gaps, and a remediation backlog.
A worked reference architecture rather than an illustration: three systems, what each one owns, and what it puts on the wire. This is the artefact we produce first on an integration engagement, filled in with your systems.
Enterprise integrations →Salesforce
System of record for
Opportunity, Quote, Account relationship
Writes an outbound event on state change
Integration layer
Owns
Mapping, sequencing, retry state
Deduplicates on a stable business key
ERP
System of record for
Order, Invoice, Pricing, Stock
Returns an acknowledgement with its own identifier
Generic reference architecture. The actual interfaces, ownership matrix, and operating responsibilities are defined per engagement during discovery.
A consultancy can describe its standards. A product has to survive contact with real documents and real users. These are ours - designed and built by the same engineers who do the client work.
Documents in. Predictable data out.
Document extraction for automation workflows: structured fields with source checks and confidence, Ready vs Review required routing, and delivery by API, webhook, or export. Pricing and policies live on docsolved.ai.
| Field | Value | Confidence | Source evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| supplier.name | Northwind Components BV | 0.99 | p.1 · 62,118 · 214×18 |
| invoice.number | INV-2026-004471 | 0.98 | p.1 · 431,96 · 132×16 |
| invoice.issueDate | 2026-03-04 | 0.96 | p.1 · 431,124 · 96×16 |
| total.net | 18 420.00 EUR | 0.97 | p.2 · 388,642 · 118×18 |
| total.vat | 3 868.20 EUR | 0.94 | p.2 · 388,668 · 110×18 |
| paymentTerms | 30 days net | 0.61 | p.2 · 64,712 · 176×16 |
The last row is the point. paymentTerms scored below the review threshold, so it is flagged for a person instead of being written silently - and the source column means checking it takes one click, not a document hunt.
Illustration of the output structure - field, value, confidence, and source coordinates - using an invented document. Not a screenshot, not a benchmark, and not an accuracy claim.
Open-source document processing for Salesforce
A Salesforce-native workspace that submits Salesforce Files to a document-processing provider you choose, tracks job state, supports human review, and can write extracted values back to linked records. Apache-2.0, installed from source.
We do not publish client names, logos, or outcome numbers without written approval and a figure we can stand behind. Neither exists yet, so this section shows only what we can evidence - delivered team experience, and the software above that runs today.
SAP
Team experienceDelivered pattern · Historical delivery
Synairo has team-level delivery experience with Salesforce and SAP/ERP integrations. Each implementation depends on the customer's SAP product, interfaces, and operating model.
The product above is also delivered work, designed, built, and operated by the same engineers: DocSolved.ai is live today.
Systems we work with - capability catalogue →“Team experience” means we have delivered this pattern and can point to the engineer who did. Systems we can design against but have no delivered reference for are listed on the solutions page, marked as capability rather than delivery. None of these are prebuilt connectors.
A logo wall usually means one of three things: an approved reference, one small piece of work dressed up as a partnership, or a mark nobody asked permission to use. Only the first is worth anything to you, and it takes the longest to get. Until a case study is approved and has a result we can state honestly, this space stays empty rather than getting filled.
In the meantime: ask us in a call. We will talk through specific systems we have integrated and problems we have fixed, and arrange a reference conversation under NDA where the client agrees to one.
These are the practices we apply, not guarantees we sell. Service levels, acceptance criteria, and operational responsibilities belong in a project scope agreed with you - not in a bullet list on a website.
Which system owns which field, in which direction, and who resolves a conflict. Written down per field, because every argument in year two resolves back to it.
Retry policy, backoff, dead-letter destination, and replay tooling are part of the interface specification. A message that cannot be processed has to land somewhere a person can see it.
Stable business keys and idempotent writes, so a retried message is a no-op rather than a duplicate record. This is the single control that prevents most integration incidents.
A reconciliation job that compares both sides on a schedule will find the drift an interface quietly introduced. Without one, you learn about it from a customer.
Logging is designed around what a first responder needs to answer: what failed, for which record, and what to do next. Volume of logs is not the same as observability.
An interface without a named owner at each end degrades quietly. We agree who watches the error queue and who can prioritise a fix, during design rather than after the first incident.
Notes from delivery, not content marketing. Each one names the engineer who wrote it and cites the primary documentation it relies on, so you can check the reasoning rather than take it on trust.
All engineering notes →Attachments versus Files, library taxonomy, Files Connect, and the sharing decisions that are expensive to reverse once an org is live.
2 cited sources · 6 min read
Informational guide to AP workflow on Salesforce: intake, extraction, matching, approval, ERP hand-off, and exception monitoring. Not a product pitch.
3 cited sources · 7 min read
Informational architecture guide for Salesforce-to-ERP interfaces: canonical models, Platform Events, CDC, idempotency, retries, reconciliation, and observability. For engaging Synairo to design or fix your landscape, see the Salesforce ERP integration service page.
2 cited sources · 8 min read
From Agentforce to Einstein Copilot and Data Cloud, here are the five AI trends every Salesforce architect needs to understand right now.
3 cited sources · 4 min read
No account layer, no delivery pod, no offshore second team. The person who scopes the work is the person who writes it and the person who answers when it breaks. That is the whole company, and it is the reason we take a narrow set of problems.
Formal Salesforce and MuleSoft certifications are named in full on each engineering profile.
Salesforce Tech Lead & Integration Specialist
On an engagement
Salesforce Technical Architect
On an engagement
Not a form that routes to a sales queue. The address below reaches both of us, and the reply comes from whichever of us knows the answer. We typically respond within one business day.
What makes a first message useful
If it is not something we should take on, we will say so and tell you what we would look for instead. Please do not send credentials, customer data, or confidential documents in a first message.